America to Obama: We Don’t Want Your Healthcare Reform!

Wednesday, August 5th, 2009

America is speaking, loud and clear:

WASHINGTON — Senator Arlen Specter and the health and human services secretary, Kathleen Sebelius, were heckled and booed in Philadelphia on Sunday.

In Austin on Saturday, a throng of protesters enveloped Representative Lloyd Doggett, Democrat of Texas, at a supermarket where he was trying to meet constituents. They carried signs that said “No Socialized Health Care” and chanted “Just say no!”

And in Morrisville, Pa., Representative Patrick J. Murphy, a Democrat, expected 25 people at a “Congressman on Your Corner” event on Saturday. Instead he was met by a boisterous crowd of about 150 and a barrage of questions on health care.

Americans have read the Obamacare proposal, even if the Congress and the President have not, and do not like what they see. Rationed health care for everyone, denial of health care for senior citizens, and the forced closure of the private insurance industry are just a few of the things which are causing the anger.

Democrats are trying to write-off these demonstrations as “extreme” and “fringe,” but the truth is that the people who are complaining are just regular folks who have tired of this Administration’s endless string of broken promises. Now, as top Administration officials say that taxes on the middle class will have to be raised to pay for this proposal, in contradiction of Obama’s campaign promises, Americans are getting angry. And the Democrats have noticed:

Voters are expected to make known their growing doubts about Obama’s push. Among the emotional issues driving those doubts are fears about government-run insurance plans, a growing federal deficit, the impact on small businesses, abortion and end-of-life provisions. Political parties and special interest groups will add to the cacophony by spending millions of dollars on competing ads.

The White House intends to counter those influences aggressively throughout the month. White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said, for instance, that he believes some groups are “manufacturing that anger.”

This week, before the debate crystallizes outside of Washington, the White House hopes to build as much momentum as possible.

Of course! The only dissent possible to one of the Obamessiah’s ideas is manufactured dissent. It couldn’t possibly be genuine, because only an idiot would stop a government takeover of the health care system, right? In any event, it doesn’t look like the Democrats care whether or not you want this reform or not; they’re going to jam it through using each and every dirty trick they can:

Reid said that a bipartisan bill is the goal, “if there’s any way humanly possible” given the “loud, shrill voices” aiming to derail the process. But he and the other senators gathered around him also said health care reform would happen without bipartisan support if it wasn’t possible.

“The preference is do it together,” Baucus said shortly after the White House meeting. “The American people do not like partisanship. But the American people also don’t like groups of people trying to kill something that should be done, should get passed. … So we’re going to get it done.”

As is usual for Democrats these days, Reid is lying through his teeth. They have no intention of trying to pass a bi-partisan bill; they’re going to use reconciliation to pass the bill with only 51 votes instead of the required 60:

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., the third-ranking Senate Democrat, raised the prospect of the leadership crafting a bill to Democratic specifications and using a rare legislative procedure to expedite legislation fulfilling President Barack Obama’s top domestic priority.

“We will have contingencies in place. These plans will likely be considered as a last resort, but they are on the table,” Schumer told reporters on a conference call. He declined to elaborate.

Schumer said Democratic leaders continue to look at invoking a procedural maneuver that would allow them to pass the health bill with 51 instead of 60 votes. That route is viewed as a last resort since it limits what legislative measures would be allowed and any broad policy initiatives would probably have to be limited.

Schumer and the rest of the Democrat chain-gang will use this trick at the first opportunity they get. For weeks now, Democrats have been telling the public that the bill has to be passed “right now,” or “quickly.” Hell, they want it passed so fast that no one on the Democrat side of the isle has even read the bill!

So, can anything be done to stop these liberal weasels from railroading the public into socialized health care? Well, the August Recess gives us all a chance to express our opinions to our Congressional Representatives, assuming that they are still representing the people they are supposed to serve. Of course, it looks like they are ignoring any and all dissent and trying to convince everyone that it is all coming from a small group of conservative extremists, so chances are small that your Democrat rep will listen. It appears that they are determined to shove it down your throat.

The question is, are you going to let them?

NOTE: While looking for the two videos linked above, I noticed that the only videos that came up in my search results on Google were pro-reform videos (terms used: health care reform). Gee, you think that’s just a coincidence?

http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/digg_48.png http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/reddit_48.png http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/dzone_48.png http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/stumbleupon_48.png http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/delicious_48.png http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/blogmarks_48.png http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/newsvine_48.png http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/technorati_48.png http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/google_48.png http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/wp-content/plugins/sociofluid/images/yahoobuzz_48.png

6 Responses to “America to Obama: We Don’t Want Your Healthcare Reform!”

  1.   Reiuxcat Says:

    The fact that the democrats are believing that all this dissent is manufactuered and not real is mind boggling, yet not surprising either.

    How’s the new kitty working out? Has he settled in yet?

  2.   rxvette Says:

    I always find it interesting that opponents to health care reform argue that it will be the “death to all of us” or “it will restrict our choices” or “medical decisions will be made by bureaucrats”.

    It is the current unregulated capitalistic private insurance companies who are actually fulfilling their worst nightmare right now. “Death to us all” – private insurance companies are literally killing patients right now by denying lifesaving care like in the case of Cigna’s denial of Natalie Sarkisyan’s care.

    “It will restrict our choices” which is exactly what our private insurers are doing. I have private coverage myself as a medical professional through my hospital who employs me. I’m restricted to a list of doctors I can see and also to only 4 hospitals in the local Tampa Bay area and if I seek medical care outside of this my insurer will put a majority of the financial cost on me so if I want somewhat affordable medical care I’m forced into their restrictive measures.

    “Medical decisions will be made by bureaucrats” – in the private insurance market medical decisions aren’t made by myself or my doctor but rather by bureaucrats (executives and internal business analysts) from my private insurers when they decide what is covered and what is not.

    Healthcare reform would put a stop to all this and I’ve actually researched for hours on what the best way to achieve this is. Here’s my solutions – http://bit.ly/9QLV8

  3.   Nick Says:

    Reiuxcat: I don’t believe that the left believes that all of the opposition to the government takeover of health care is all manufactured. I think they are just saying this to try to convince everyone who disagrees with them that it is manufactured. The anger from middle America is real, and they ignore it or write it off at their own peril.

    Vinnie is doing great. Yes, he has settled in, and every morning he is sitting at my bedroom door to greet me when I get up.

  4.   Nick Says:

    rxvette: I read your post, and there are some good ideas there. However, all the proposed government takeover of health care is going to do is change which non-medical personnel will be deciding what care we can and cannot get. It doesn’t propose to change that, nor does it propose anything which will lower the cost of health care. In fact, by capping reimbursements to doctors for their work, it will actually reduce the number of doctors available to Americans.

    If you read any of my posts regarding my recent health problems, you know that I am knee-deep into the current health care system. No one knows more than me that it is far from perfect. However, unlike in other countries, it is a rare thing for a person to die for want of medical care in this country. I can’t remember the last time I had to wait longer than 3 days to get an x-ray or MRI exam. Finally, while I have had to fight with my insurance company occasionally, they have always ended up paying for whatever procedure my doctors have wanted me to have.

    People from all over the world come to this country to get medical care because it is the best in the world. A government takeover of our health care system would only ruin it and reduce the standard of care for all Americans.

  5.   Dave Ryan-Managing Editor Says:

    To reduce Health Cost by 33%-50% no new legislation or taxation is needed.
    Simply REPEAL THE MCCARREN-FRGUSON ANTI TRUST EXEMPTION ACT OF 1945, which allows Health Insurance Comapnies to consult with other Health Insurance Companies and fix premiums and prevent foreign Insurance companies from selling health insurance to Americans in the USA, which they can do, COVERING ALL PRE-EXISITING CONDITIONS, for a fraction of the premiums charged by Blue Cross Blue Shield.
    Read about this in ‘To-day’s Editorial’ in the Online Interactive News Medium:
    http://www.usanewsandinformationservice.com and send your comments to daveusanews@yahoo.com Click on the link and view ABC News Ted Kopell’s expose on this repressive Law.
    Repealing this law will reduce Health costs by abot 40% and considerably decrease the campaign contributions to your elected officials in Congress, since Health Insurance Companies can no longer rob you under the protection of this law and turn around and donate Millions to your representatives. Call or write to your Incumbent Senator or Representative, that if you Do not see proof that this repressive laws has been removed and such legislation has been signed by the President on or before 10-15-2010, you will vote in November 2010, for his opponent, whoever he or she may be.
    Remeber in NOVEMBER 2010 YOUR VOTE CONTROLS ALL THE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS dontaed to all the candidates in the Congress. If you throw them out, they not only lose their billions, but also their Congressional pay and perks, including their Royal Health Insurance Plans.
    Dave-8/14/2009 Usa News and Information Service- a dot com interactive news medium.

  6.   Frank Savryn Says:

    I endorse the above.

    frank