Comments on: Preview of a Hillary Clinton Administration? http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2008/01/27/preview-of-a-hillary-clinton-administration/ Removing Liberal Waste From The American Bloodstream Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:30:01 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: Mike Thomas http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2008/01/27/preview-of-a-hillary-clinton-administration/comment-page-1/#comment-1193 Mike Thomas Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:55:34 +0000 http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2008/01/27/preview-of-a-hillary-clinton-administration/#comment-1193 It's the difference between using it as a noun and an adjective. Think of how you call yourself an American from the United States of America. You wouldn't say "I'm an America." Nor would you say "I live in American." It is just improper usage. The person using it that way is either ignorant of the correct usage, or is misusing it intentionally to make a statement. <a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200608160005" rel="nofollow"> Here is an article </a> that gives all the background and detail. As for this nonsense that modern Democrats are anti-military, I'll just say that most Democrats would never have sent our troops off without adequate equipment, armor or numbers to fight in a bloody civil war that was totally unrelated to the terrorist attack on our nation. And I will remind you that Osama bin Laden is still free today, al-Qaeda (the global terrorist network and not the sockpuppet wannabes in Iraq) is reportedly stronger today than it was before 9/11 and, in addition, they are rid of one of their archnemesis in the Middle East, one Saddam Hussein. And that doesn't even get into the other awful aspects of this administration's shameful treatment of our troops, from cutting back on combat pay and widowers benefits, to the wretched state of Veteran's health care. Did you ever wonder why almost all of the combat veterans coming back from Iraq who get into politics run as Democrats? As for the political infighting between Hillary and Obama, I'll just say that it doesn't hold a candle to the nastiness of<a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2008/01/28/mccain-romney-go-another-round/" rel="nofollow"> the McCain - Romney slugfest.</a> Sheesh! It’s the difference between using it as a noun and an adjective. Think of how you call yourself an American from the United States of America. You wouldn’t say “I’m an America.” Nor would you say “I live in American.” It is just improper usage. The person using it that way is either ignorant of the correct usage, or is misusing it intentionally to make a statement.
Here is an article that gives all the background and detail.

As for this nonsense that modern Democrats are anti-military, I’ll just say that most Democrats would never have sent our troops off without adequate equipment, armor or numbers to fight in a bloody civil war that was totally unrelated to the terrorist attack on our nation. And I will remind you that Osama bin Laden is still free today, al-Qaeda (the global terrorist network and not the sockpuppet wannabes in Iraq) is reportedly stronger today than it was before 9/11 and, in addition, they are rid of one of their archnemesis in the Middle East, one Saddam Hussein.
And that doesn’t even get into the other awful aspects of this administration’s shameful treatment of our troops, from cutting back on combat pay and widowers benefits, to the wretched state of Veteran’s health care.
Did you ever wonder why almost all of the combat veterans coming back from Iraq who get into politics run as Democrats?

As for the political infighting between Hillary and Obama, I’ll just say that it doesn’t hold a candle to the nastiness of the McCain – Romney slugfest. Sheesh!

]]> By: Nick Marinelli http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2008/01/27/preview-of-a-hillary-clinton-administration/comment-page-1/#comment-1192 Nick Marinelli Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:59:13 +0000 http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2008/01/27/preview-of-a-hillary-clinton-administration/#comment-1192 You know, I use the term as a way to make a distinction between the modern Democrats and the Democrats from 1960 and earlier. The earlier Democrats understood the need for a strong military, whereas modern Democrats seem to think if we're just <em>nicer</em> to those who attack us, they'll leave us alone. I don't see how it "vilifies" anyone, and if calling the party "Democrat" is a vilification, then why isn't calling an individual a "Democrat" a vilification? Regarding Giuliani, he must have almost all of the early vote if he has any shot. I saw today that somewhere close to a million voters in Florida took advantage of early voting, so a strong second-place finish isn't out of the question. Regarding the Billary/Obama race, all I can do is sit back, get some popcorn, and laugh my ass off watching the Clinton political machine do to Obama what its done to Repulicans for years; mostly lie, deceive, and divide the voters. Finally, liberals are starting to realize how dishonest and dirty these people are, and all I have to say is, <b>WE TOLD YOU SO</b>. You know, I use the term as a way to make a distinction between the modern Democrats and the Democrats from 1960 and earlier. The earlier Democrats understood the need for a strong military, whereas modern Democrats seem to think if we’re just nicer to those who attack us, they’ll leave us alone. I don’t see how it “vilifies” anyone, and if calling the party “Democrat” is a vilification, then why isn’t calling an individual a “Democrat” a vilification?

Regarding Giuliani, he must have almost all of the early vote if he has any shot. I saw today that somewhere close to a million voters in Florida took advantage of early voting, so a strong second-place finish isn’t out of the question.

Regarding the Billary/Obama race, all I can do is sit back, get some popcorn, and laugh my ass off watching the Clinton political machine do to Obama what its done to Repulicans for years; mostly lie, deceive, and divide the voters. Finally, liberals are starting to realize how dishonest and dirty these people are, and all I have to say is, WE TOLD YOU SO.

]]> By: Mike Thomas http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2008/01/27/preview-of-a-hillary-clinton-administration/comment-page-1/#comment-1191 Mike Thomas Tue, 29 Jan 2008 17:28:11 +0000 http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2008/01/27/preview-of-a-hillary-clinton-administration/#comment-1191 The National Democrat Party? Never heard of it. Same with the Florida Democrat Party. I think you mean the Democratic Party. This petty business of dropping the -ic to slight Democrats is a pet peeve of mine. I don't know who first started doing it, but I know that Newt Gingrich encouraged it when he was Speaker as part of his effort to use language to vilify and denigrate the political opposition. On the Hillary/Obama race, I'm surprised to see that it is so close. Same with Romney/McCain. I think Florida will finally put Giuliani out of his misery, but it may still be a two-person race on both sides when Texas gets to vote in March. The National Democrat Party? Never heard of it. Same with the Florida Democrat Party. I think you mean the Democratic Party. This petty business of dropping the -ic to slight Democrats is a pet peeve of mine. I don’t know who first started doing it, but I know that Newt Gingrich encouraged it when he was Speaker as part of his effort to use language to vilify and denigrate the political opposition.

On the Hillary/Obama race, I’m surprised to see that it is so close. Same with Romney/McCain. I think Florida will finally put Giuliani out of his misery, but it may still be a two-person race on both sides when Texas gets to vote in March.

]]>