<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Impressions of WordPress 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2006/01/03/first-impressions-of-wordpress-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2006/01/03/first-impressions-of-wordpress-20/</link>
	<description>Removing Liberal Waste From The American Bloodstream</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Apr 2012 21:30:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: cb</title>
		<link>http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2006/01/03/first-impressions-of-wordpress-20/comment-page-1/#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>cb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 23:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2006/01/03/first-impressions-of-wordpress-20/#comment-698</guid>
		<description>Hey Nick, my impressions are mostly the same. Biggest problem so far, though, are the trackback issues with WP2.0.

I agree about the non-configurable upload functionality. Year/Month may not be the most appropriate storage convention for everyone (and in order to make the entire blog consistent, I had to manually move my old uploads into the current directory structure underneath &quot;uploads&quot;, and then manually edit posts that referenced those files; fortunately, only a few posts were affected).

I like the way the upload changes work with respect to posting/editing now, however. I don&#039;t use the WYSIWYG editor (it&#039;s just a blog post, after all), so I don&#039;t know how the functionality differs between it and the HTML editor; however, the upload functionality in the HTML editor has options for the images that allow configuring how the image is displayed: thumbnail linked to image page, image linked to image page, or stand-alone image. The &quot;send to editor&quot; command accomplishes the same thing as WYSIWIG drag-and-drop, IMO.

I really don&#039;t think there&#039;s much inherent difference between user &quot;levels&quot; and &quot;roles&quot;, assuming levels were used consistently. If so, then &quot;roles&quot; are nothing more than pre-defined levels. Regardless, it might be a bit more intuitive to think in terms of roles than numbers.

But, all-in-all, I do like the new release!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Nick, my impressions are mostly the same. Biggest problem so far, though, are the trackback issues with WP2.0.</p>
<p>I agree about the non-configurable upload functionality. Year/Month may not be the most appropriate storage convention for everyone (and in order to make the entire blog consistent, I had to manually move my old uploads into the current directory structure underneath &#8220;uploads&#8221;, and then manually edit posts that referenced those files; fortunately, only a few posts were affected).</p>
<p>I like the way the upload changes work with respect to posting/editing now, however. I don&#8217;t use the WYSIWYG editor (it&#8217;s just a blog post, after all), so I don&#8217;t know how the functionality differs between it and the HTML editor; however, the upload functionality in the HTML editor has options for the images that allow configuring how the image is displayed: thumbnail linked to image page, image linked to image page, or stand-alone image. The &#8220;send to editor&#8221; command accomplishes the same thing as WYSIWIG drag-and-drop, IMO.</p>
<p>I really don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s much inherent difference between user &#8220;levels&#8221; and &#8220;roles&#8221;, assuming levels were used consistently. If so, then &#8220;roles&#8221; are nothing more than pre-defined levels. Regardless, it might be a bit more intuitive to think in terms of roles than numbers.</p>
<p>But, all-in-all, I do like the new release!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

