<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Harriet Miers: Some Thoughts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2005/10/04/harriet-miers-some-thoughts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2005/10/04/harriet-miers-some-thoughts/</link>
	<description>Removing Liberal Waste From The American Bloodstream</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:12:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gars Luber</title>
		<link>http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2005/10/04/harriet-miers-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Gars Luber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 18:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2005/10/04/harriet-miers-some-thoughts/#comment-600</guid>
		<description>Now you Chicken Hawks know what it&#039;s like to be on the bad end of Bush nominees who refuse to talk, evade questions, or pretend not to have opinions. It&#039;s as if they were borne from pods that morning.

Good luck Armchair Generals... she&#039;s your judge and he&#039;s your president. Now you have to live with it also.

Can anyone spare a few trillion to fix his deficit?

bok bok Chicken Hawks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you Chicken Hawks know what it&#8217;s like to be on the bad end of Bush nominees who refuse to talk, evade questions, or pretend not to have opinions. It&#8217;s as if they were borne from pods that morning.</p>
<p>Good luck Armchair Generals&#8230; she&#8217;s your judge and he&#8217;s your president. Now you have to live with it also.</p>
<p>Can anyone spare a few trillion to fix his deficit?</p>
<p>bok bok Chicken Hawks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Railroad Stone</title>
		<link>http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2005/10/04/harriet-miers-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-599</link>
		<dc:creator>Railroad Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 04:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2005/10/04/harriet-miers-some-thoughts/#comment-599</guid>
		<description>America obviously isn&#039;t ready for democracy yet. 

Think about this.  If Diebold are as pissed about Miers as the rest of you are, the 2008 ballot has already been won by Hilary. 

Thanks a sarcastic bunch for that!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America obviously isn&#8217;t ready for democracy yet. </p>
<p>Think about this.  If Diebold are as pissed about Miers as the rest of you are, the 2008 ballot has already been won by Hilary. </p>
<p>Thanks a sarcastic bunch for that!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Evil Progressive</title>
		<link>http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2005/10/04/harriet-miers-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-598</link>
		<dc:creator>Evil Progressive</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 03:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2005/10/04/harriet-miers-some-thoughts/#comment-598</guid>
		<description>Another Souter? What are you, stupid?

She is the cretin-in-chief confidante. If confirmed, she&#039;ll be a nice little toadie who will do everything to further Bush&#039;s and the GOP hardliners&#039; agenda.

Don&#039;t insult Souter either. Harriet has zero credentials, and a brain barely larger than that of your moronic President. Souter, on the other hand, has a brain between his ears, and the legal scholarship to go with it. 

She is singularly unqualified to be appointed -- for life -- to the highest court in the land. She has never clerked for a judge, she has never pled a case in front of the Supreme Court, she has no record of legal scholarship whatsoever, and she has never been on the bench. In other words, her resume would not get her appointed to the mailroom in corporate America. 

She is yet another case of &quot;Hey, Harriet, you are doing a heck of a job&quot; -- an incompetent crony and political hack being nominated to a crucial post by the stupidest, most parochial, most incompetent, and most corrupt, President in this country&#039;s history. 

To top it all, she is also an Evangelical nut, i.e., one of our home-grown Taliban-types who want to turn this country into a theocracy. Hello, Iran, you are not alone. This beacon of democracy and enlightement of a country of ours is being taken over by unhinged religious fanatics!

Why the Democrats are rejoicing at the choice of such an incompetent hack as a Supreme Court justice, I cannot fathom. Or rather, I can surmise that they are their usual spineless and toothless selves, and they are just happy that they did not have to filibuster anyone...

The Republicans are corrupt, sleazy, trash, only interested in stealing taxpayer&#039;s money and handing it out to special interests. Cut taxes and spend, spend, spend... On bridges to nowhere and fat, no-bid contracts, to Cheney&#039;s cronies... 

Never mind humongous farming subsidies and a Medicare prescription bill that prohibits Medicare to use the first principle of Business 101: use buyer power to negotiate better prices. Did the Moron-in-Chief retain anything from his MBA days at Harvard? Or was he too drunk through it all? But then again, he only got into Harvard because he comes from a family of influence-peddlers. The moron could not have gotten into a community college had his grades been the only criterion...

And that hapless little turd is the President of the United States? it tells a lot about the intelligence of those who voted for this ridiculous creature.  

H. L. Mencken famoulsy said: &quot;  No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people&quot;. He was wrong, the country is now broke. More tax cuts and increased spending anyone? Since little George has a direct line to God, maybe it is time to ask for some manna from heaven?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another Souter? What are you, stupid?</p>
<p>She is the cretin-in-chief confidante. If confirmed, she&#8217;ll be a nice little toadie who will do everything to further Bush&#8217;s and the GOP hardliners&#8217; agenda.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t insult Souter either. Harriet has zero credentials, and a brain barely larger than that of your moronic President. Souter, on the other hand, has a brain between his ears, and the legal scholarship to go with it. </p>
<p>She is singularly unqualified to be appointed &#8212; for life &#8212; to the highest court in the land. She has never clerked for a judge, she has never pled a case in front of the Supreme Court, she has no record of legal scholarship whatsoever, and she has never been on the bench. In other words, her resume would not get her appointed to the mailroom in corporate America. </p>
<p>She is yet another case of &#8220;Hey, Harriet, you are doing a heck of a job&#8221; &#8212; an incompetent crony and political hack being nominated to a crucial post by the stupidest, most parochial, most incompetent, and most corrupt, President in this country&#8217;s history. </p>
<p>To top it all, she is also an Evangelical nut, i.e., one of our home-grown Taliban-types who want to turn this country into a theocracy. Hello, Iran, you are not alone. This beacon of democracy and enlightement of a country of ours is being taken over by unhinged religious fanatics!</p>
<p>Why the Democrats are rejoicing at the choice of such an incompetent hack as a Supreme Court justice, I cannot fathom. Or rather, I can surmise that they are their usual spineless and toothless selves, and they are just happy that they did not have to filibuster anyone&#8230;</p>
<p>The Republicans are corrupt, sleazy, trash, only interested in stealing taxpayer&#8217;s money and handing it out to special interests. Cut taxes and spend, spend, spend&#8230; On bridges to nowhere and fat, no-bid contracts, to Cheney&#8217;s cronies&#8230; </p>
<p>Never mind humongous farming subsidies and a Medicare prescription bill that prohibits Medicare to use the first principle of Business 101: use buyer power to negotiate better prices. Did the Moron-in-Chief retain anything from his MBA days at Harvard? Or was he too drunk through it all? But then again, he only got into Harvard because he comes from a family of influence-peddlers. The moron could not have gotten into a community college had his grades been the only criterion&#8230;</p>
<p>And that hapless little turd is the President of the United States? it tells a lot about the intelligence of those who voted for this ridiculous creature.  </p>
<p>H. L. Mencken famoulsy said: &#8221;  No one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American people&#8221;. He was wrong, the country is now broke. More tax cuts and increased spending anyone? Since little George has a direct line to God, maybe it is time to ask for some manna from heaven?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2005/10/04/harriet-miers-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-597</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 22:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2005/10/04/harriet-miers-some-thoughts/#comment-597</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t make sense if you look at it through a &quot;corporate/little guy&quot; eye either. The whole point of the post was that there is no &quot;paper trail&quot; to determine her judicial philosophy, so we have to take it on faith that Bush knows what her judicial philosphy is. 

It doesn&#039;t have anything to do with corporate interests, although it is obvious that from your liberal viewpoint that everyone in the Bush Admin is controlled by some dark, secret corporate board that meets once a week in an undisclosed location to discuss and decide what will happen in the world this week.

Pity that this corporate board doesn&#039;t exist.  If it did, conservatives would have won everything a long time ago.  As it is, all this paranoid fantasy does is give you guys something to complain about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t make sense if you look at it through a &#8220;corporate/little guy&#8221; eye either. The whole point of the post was that there is no &#8220;paper trail&#8221; to determine her judicial philosophy, so we have to take it on faith that Bush knows what her judicial philosphy is. </p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t have anything to do with corporate interests, although it is obvious that from your liberal viewpoint that everyone in the Bush Admin is controlled by some dark, secret corporate board that meets once a week in an undisclosed location to discuss and decide what will happen in the world this week.</p>
<p>Pity that this corporate board doesn&#8217;t exist.  If it did, conservatives would have won everything a long time ago.  As it is, all this paranoid fantasy does is give you guys something to complain about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Gillnitz</title>
		<link>http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2005/10/04/harriet-miers-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-596</link>
		<dc:creator>John Gillnitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2005/10/04/harriet-miers-some-thoughts/#comment-596</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t make sense as long as you try to make every decision fit into a liberal/conservative paradigm. What you should look at is who is going to jump when the cabala of corporate interests that prop up the Bush Admin. say jump. What Roberts and Meirs have in common is that they both reflexively yield to the powers that be without any pesky judicial integrity getting in the way. The best qualification is following orders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t make sense as long as you try to make every decision fit into a liberal/conservative paradigm. What you should look at is who is going to jump when the cabala of corporate interests that prop up the Bush Admin. say jump. What Roberts and Meirs have in common is that they both reflexively yield to the powers that be without any pesky judicial integrity getting in the way. The best qualification is following orders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Shawn Barber's Corner</title>
		<link>http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2005/10/04/harriet-miers-some-thoughts/comment-page-1/#comment-595</link>
		<dc:creator>La Shawn Barber's Corner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 19:10:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservativedialysis.com/~mnick/wp/index.php/2005/10/04/harriet-miers-some-thoughts/#comment-595</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Who is Harriet Miers?&lt;/strong&gt;

	This is my obligatory Harriet Miers post. I&#8217;m having trouble generating enough interest to write about the Supreme Court nominations. I honestly couldn&#8217;t care less that George Bush picked yet another crony for an important job, a lifetime ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Who is Harriet Miers?</strong></p>
<p>	This is my obligatory Harriet Miers post. I&#8217;m having trouble generating enough interest to write about the Supreme Court nominations. I honestly couldn&#8217;t care less that George Bush picked yet another crony for an important job, a lifetime &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

